Skip to main content
Sales Performance Management

Straightening out the Bell Curve: Spurring sales mobility with smarter evaluations

By September 19, 2017January 16th, 2023No Comments

The Bell Curve has long served as the basis for many enterprise evaluations, including sales mobility. This model operates on the theory of “normal distribution” – the idea that an arithmetic mean for performance has an equal distribution above and below the curve. In short, it asserts that the performance of most people in a variety of activities – sales performance and compensation among them – cluster around an average level, with the same number of above- and below-average performers. It gets drilled into us beginning in school – the phrase “grading by the curve” might ring a bell.

Many companies adhere to this model for assessing – and rewarding – employee performance, and it’s actually causing them to lose some of their best employees, wrote Josh Bersin, principal and founder of Bersin by Deloitte, in a recent LinkedIn post. When evaluation time comes, an organization may distribute its sales performance totals, find the employee average and form the curve. They then use these findings to inform sales mobility strategies, rewards for top performers and punishments for those turning in below-average marks.

Why sales mobility doesn’t ring the Bell Curve
There are several problems with using the Bell Curve, Bersin argued. Foremost among them is that it requires evaluators to grade according to rigid definitions of the curve. On a five-point scale, for example, this would mean that only 10 percent of employees could possibly merit a perfect “five” rating, while 10 percent would have to be forced into a low “one” score. The rest are treated as average.

This practice can create a wildly inaccurate picture of true performance. It may be that 25 percent of employees performed at a level an employer would consider exemplary, but only a fraction of these will be rewarded as such. On the other hand, forcing 10 percent to earn fives can obscure overall lackluster results.

Empowering power users
Bersin opined that a more effective metric for measuring performance and influencing sales mobility strategies is the “Power Law” distribution, first developed through research conducted by Ernest O’Boyle Jr. and Herman Aguinis on some of society’s “power users” – athletes, entertainers, politicians and researchers among them. This model posits that there are a small number of “hyper performers” – people who do a lion’s share of the work. There are also a relatively small number of “lower performers,” with a broad range of those who fall in the “average” category.

There are a few ways that make this the better model. First, it can help businesses get away from using numbers exclusively as a rating tool in performance and sales mobility assessments. It is a tactic that many employees feel uncomfortable with or outright despise. Additionally, employees who know their employers use a Bell Curve understand that only a select group earn the top rankings, no matter if 10 percent or 80 percent perform at a high level. These productive employees may grow discouraged and seek their fortunes elsewhere.

This model also isolates the “hyper performers” into a class by themselves. It is these employees who often do the bulk of the work and they are the ones who companies should try to retain and empower. Performance rewards and bonuses can be rewarded accordingly – instead of a hyper-performing “five” receiving a small increase over a “four” who did much less work, he or she can earn money commensurate with performance. It also builds a culture more open to sales mobility en masse, leading to high performance across the board.

“The distribution reflects the idea that ‘we want everyone to become a hyper-performer’ if they can find the right role, and that we don’t limit people at the top of the curve – we try to build more of them,” Bersin wrote. “Companies that understand this model focus very heavily on collaboration, professional development, coaching, and empowering people to do great things.”

Leave a Reply

Close Menu
Ballast Point Ventures

Ballast Point Ventures is a later-stage venture capital fund established to provide expansion capital for rapidly growing, privately owned companies in diverse industries, with a particular emphasis on companies located in Florida, the Southeast, and Texas. The BPV partners have more than 70 years of combined experience investing in and building high-growth companies in a number of industries, including healthcare, business services, communications, technology, financial services, and consumer goods. BPV has $200 million under management and seeks to make equity investments ranging from $3 million to $10 million.

Harbert Management Corporation

Harbert Management Corporation seeks to generate superior returns for their investors by identifying and investing in the most promising early growth stage companies in the Southeastern U.S. HMC seeks to capitalize on what it believes are compelling regional dynamics, such as a strong and fast-growing economy, significant research and development activities, and an established entrepreneurial community. The HMC team combines substantial investment, advisory, and operating experience with capital and networking contacts to support great entrepreneurial teams in successfully executing their growth plans. With offices in Birmingham, Alabama; Richmond, Virginia; and Gainesville, Florida, it’s well positioned to partner with entrepreneurs throughout the Southeast.

KBH Ventures

KBH Ventures was an early investor in Iconixx Software. KBH's investment philosophy plays a significant role in the firm's successful track record. KBH believes in running businesses to be cashflow positive and profitable every month. Startups and companies in a startup mode, such as one that has been purchased in distress, are expected to generate revenue within the first six months and reach profitability within the first 12 to 18 months. KBH also only invests in or acquires companies that are in the startup phase or have less than $20 million in revenues. KBH targets technology companies that offer business-to-business services.

S3 Ventures

S3 Ventures is an early expansion and growth stage venture firm with $200 million under management. It’s focused on information technology solutions that solve large business problems. S3 also invests in medical devices that improve the human condition. S3 invests in category-defining opportunities. It partners with the team and help focus methodically on what it takes to build a successful company. S3 today helps talented entrepreneurs take their technology and market knowledge and form valuable businesses in a repeatable fashion. Investment sizes start at several million or more for Series A, B, and C financing.